Birds Guide

Crossbills
Red (Common) Crossbill
Scientific classification
Kingdom: Animalia   Phylum: Chordata   Class: Aves   Order: Passeriformes   Family: Fringillidae   Genus: Loxia (but see "Systematics and evolution" below) Linnaeus, 1758
Species
Loxia pytyopsittacus Loxia scotia Loxia curvirostra Loxia leucoptera Loxia megaplaga

The crossbills are birds in the finch family Fringillidae. The three to five (or possibly many more) species are all currently classified in the genus Loxia, but see below. These birds are characterised by the mandibles crossing at their tips, which gives the group its English name.

These are specialist feeders on conifer cones, and the unusual bill shape is an adaptation to assist the extraction of the seeds from the cone. These are birds typically found in higher northern hemisphere latitudes, where their food sources grows. They will erupt out of the breeding range when the cone crop fails.

Crossbills breed very early in the year, often in winter months, to take advantage of maximum cone supplies.

Adult males tend to be red or orange in colour, and females green or yellow, but there is much variation.

Contents 1 Feeding behavior 2 Systematics and evolution 3 References 4 External links

Feeding behavior

The different species are each adapted to specialising in feeding on different conifer species, with the bill shape optimised for opening that species of conifer. This is achieved by inserting the bill between the conifer cone scales and twisting the lower mandible towards the side to which it crosses, enabling the bird to extract the seed at the bottom of the scale with its tongue.

The mechanism by which the bill-crossing (which usually, but not always occurs in an 1:1 frequency of left-crossing or right-crossing morphs) is developed and what determines the direction has hitherto withstood all attempts to resolve it.

It is very probable that there is a genetic basis underlying the phenomenon (young birds whose bills are still straight will give a cone-opening behavior if their bills are gently pressed, and the crossing develops before the birds are fledged and feeding independently), but at least in the Red Crossbill (the only species which has been somewhat thoroughly researched regarding this question) there is no straightforward mechanism of heritability.

While the direction of crossing seems to be the result of at least 3 genetic factors working together in a case of epistasis and most probably autosomal, it is not clear whether the 1:1 frequency of both morphs in most cases is the result of genetics or environmental selection: populations that feed on cones without removing or twisting them will likely show a 1:1 morph distribution no matter what the genetic basis may be, as the fitness of each morph is inversely proportional to its frequency in the population due to the fact that such birds can only access the cone with the lower mandible tip pointing towards it to successfully extract seeds, and thus a too high number of birds of one morph will result in the food availability for each bird decreasing (Edelaar et al, 2005).

They can utilise other conifers to their preferred, and often need to do so when their preferred species has a crop failure, but are less efficient in their feeding (not enough to prevent survival, but probably enough to reduce breeding success).

Systematics and evolution

Analysis of mitochondrial cytochrome b sequence data (Arnaiz-Villena et al., 2001) indicates that the crossbills and redpolls share a common ancestor and only diverging during the Tortonian (c. 8 mya, Late Miocene). They suggest that the crossbills might be included in the genus Carduelis, but given that the adaptations of the crossbills represent a unique evolutionary path, it seems more appropriate to split up the genus Carduelis as it was already done during most of the 20th century.

The species of crossbills are difficult to separate, and care is needed even with Two-barred/Hispaniolan Crossbill, the easiest. The other species are identified by subtle differences in head shape and bill size, and are the subject of much taxonomic speculation, with some scientists suggesting that the previously held assumption that the Parrot and Scottish Crossbills and possibly the Hispaniolan and Two-barred Crossbill are conspecific.

The identification problem is least severe in North America, where only Red and White-winged occur, and (possibly) worst in the Scottish Highlands, where three 'species' breed, and Two-barred is also a possible vagrant.

Work on vocalisation in North America suggest that there are eight or nine discrete populations of Red Crossbill in that continent alone, which do not interbreed and are (like the named species) adapted to specialise on different conifer species. Few ornithologists yet seem inclined to give these forms species status though. Preliminary investigations in Europe and Asia suggest an equal, if not greater, complexity, with several different call types identified; these call types as different from each other as from the named species Scottish and Parrot Crossbills - suggesting either that they are valid species, or else that the Scottish and Parrot may not be.

Species and their preferred food sources are:

• Parrot Crossbill, Loxia pytyopsittacus
  • Scots pine Pinus sylvestris
• Scottish Crossbill, Loxia scotica (often treated as a race of Parrot Crossbill)
  • Scots pine Pinus sylvestris and Larch Larix species (particularly plantations of L. decidua)
• Red Crossbill or Common Crossbill, Loxia curvirostra
  • Spruce Picea species; some populations (distinct species?) on various Pine Pinus species and (in western North America) Douglas-fir
• Two-barred Crossbill or White-winged Crossbill, Loxia leucoptera
  • Larch Larix species, particularly L. sibirica, L. gmelinii, L. laricina and (in North America) also Hemlock Tsuga
• Hispaniolan Crossbill, Loxia megaplaga (previously treated as a race of Two-barred Crossbill)
  • Hispaniolan Pine Pinus occidentalis

References

• Arnaiz-Villena, A.; Guillén, J.; Ruiz-del-Valle, V.; Lowy, E.; Zamora, J.; Varela, P.; Stefani, D. & Allende, L. M. (2001): Phylogeography of crossbills, bullfinches, grosbeaks, and rosefinches. Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences 58: 1159–1166. [http://chopo.pntic.mec.es/~biolmol/publicaciones/crossbills

• Edelaar, Pim; Postma, Erik; Knops, Peter & Phillips, Ron (2005): No Support of a Genetic Basis of Mandible Crossing Direction in Crossbills (Loxia spp.). Auk, 122(4): 1123-1129. PDF fulltext

External links

• Crossbill videos on the Internet Bird Collection